1 . INTRODUCTION
Remote sensing infers the surface parameters using measurements of emitted or reflected electromagnetic radiation from the Earth surface. Remote sensing satellites offer unique opportunity in collecting land information with wide details. Land applications broadly comprises of natural and man-made features such as soil, terrain, geology, geomorphology, land use / land cover, vegetation cover, water surface and urban sprawl, etc. of the earth surface (Bhagat, 2012). Remote sensing satellites offer variety of data comprising spatial, temporal and spectral resolutions facilitate scholars and planners for characterization, mapping and temporal monitoring at various scales ranging from reconnaissance to detail scale to meet the user requirement. They provide synoptic view and visit the land surface on regular time period enabling us to better understand about land surface and allow scientists for its precise characterization in systematic manner. They provide both the synoptic view of earth surface from space in cost effective, in less time and economic manner (Landgrebe, 1999). Remotely sensed data in last 10-15 years have revolutionized the land applications in large extent by integrating multi-spectral or hyperspectral, high spatiotemporal resolution features (Jin et al., 2018).
The first remote sensing satellite was launched on July 23, 1972 named as Earth Resource Technology Satellites (ERTS) and later named as Landsat-1 was widely used for deriving land information. Thereafter, seven satellites in Landsat series were successfully launched over the period of time and made the important source of multi-temporal optical remote sensing data for land surface analysis. Landsat missions provided earth observation data as largest depositories to end-users for change detection analysis of natural and anthropogenic objects at local, regional and global scales. India launched its first remote sensing satellites as IRS [Indian Remote Sensing Satellite] 1A in March, 1982 and continued as IRS series and new generation satellite series of Resourcesat for varied land applications in the country. Wide range of spatiotemporal, radiometric and spectral resolution data has made it one of the best sources of data for land applications (Atoche et al., 2011).
Currently several satellites such as Sentinel-2, Landsat 8, RapidEye, World View-2 and 3, SPOT-6 and 7, GeoEye-1, etc. are immensely contributing in generating reliable and precise land information at large scale for their operational use by various user agencies. In India, remote sensing data is widely being used for various operational projects, such as crop inventory and crop yield estimation, forest types and cover mapping, mapping and monitoring of water resources, soil resource mapping, waste land mapping, land degradation mapping, coastal mapping, geological and geomorphological mapping, monitoring watershed development planning, urban planning, disaster management support, environmental applications, etc. High spatiotemporal satellite data is supportive for initiatives in agronomy, forestry, land use, crop insurance, urban planning and real time disaster management, etc. Thus, this data is useful to establish sustainability goals and selection of strategies for sustainable land management and monitoring the degraded lands (Bhagat, 2012).
In coming years, remote sensing satellites will support wide variety of geospatial land applications for sustainable development of the region. Several remote sensing satellites are planned to be launched in the world and in India to cater wide variety of need for environmental monitoring and effective utilization of land resources to cope up with increasing food demands and keeping the environment in sustainable manner. The present paper provides a brief review of current and future remote sensing satellites.
2 . REMOTE SENSING SATELLITES
Multi-spectral optical remote sensing sensors are providing earth observation with spatial resolution ranging from coarse (500-1000m) to fine (1-2m) resolution. High resolution data with 5-15 spectral bands (visible and infrared wavelength regions) has improved in generating information manifold and enhanced the capability for wide applications for land assessment and monitoring meeting requirement from regional to field scale. Panchromatic sensor provides very high resolution data (<1m) that helps in providing large details of land surfaces in single visible spectral band and being widely used for extracting information at very detail scale and implementing plans at local level. In recent years, it has been used in generating information at cadastral level (1:4000 scale) and for urban planning at large. Panchromatic stereo data is being used to generate high resolution digital elevation model (DEM). Brief details with salient features of Indian and other remote sensing satellite with multispectral and panchromatic sensors are given in Table 1.
Table 1. Remote sensing satellites with panchromatic and multispectral sensors
Satellite
|
Country (Year)
|
Sensors
|
Spatial resolution (m)
|
Revisit time (days)
|
Remarks
|
Resourcesat-2
|
India (2011)
|
4 MS - LISS IV
|
5.8
|
5
|
-
|
4 MS - LISS III
|
23.5
|
5
|
3 MS - AWiFS
|
56
|
5
|
Resourcesat-2A
|
India (2017)
|
4 MS - LISS IV
|
5.8
|
5
|
-
|
4 MS - LISS III
|
23.5
|
5
|
3 MS - AWiFS
|
56
|
5
|
Resourcesat-3* series
|
India (2020-2021)
|
5 MS
|
10/20
|
5
|
|
Cartosat-1
|
India (2005)
|
PAN
|
2.5
|
5
|
Stereo
|
Cartosat-2A
|
India (2008)
|
PAN
|
<1
|
4
|
-
|
Cartosat-2B
|
India (2010)
|
PAN
|
<1
|
4
|
Cartosat-2 series (2C,2D,2E &2F)
|
India (2017 and 2018)
|
PAN
|
<1
|
4
|
Cartosat-3A*
|
India
(2020-21)
|
1 PAN
4 MS
MIR
VNIR & SWIR
|
0.25
0.50
5
30
|
Daily
|
Continuous
|
GISAT / GeoHR
|
India (2020-21)
|
6 VNIR
|
50
|
Daily 30 minutes
|
|
IKONOS
|
USA (2000)
|
PAN
|
0.8
|
3-5
|
Stereo
|
|
MS (4)
|
4
|
3-5
|
|
Landsat-8
|
USA (2013)
|
OLI (8)
|
30
|
16
|
|
|
TIRS (2)
|
100
|
|
|
PAN
|
15
|
|
SPOT-7
|
France (2014)
|
PAN
|
2.5
|
1-5
|
Stereo
|
|
MS (3)
|
10/20
|
|
|
Rapid Eye
|
Germany (2008)
|
MS (5)
|
6.5
|
1-5.5
|
|
WorldView-3
|
USA (2014)
|
PAN
|
0.3
|
1-4.5
|
-
|
MS (8)
|
1.2
|
MS SWIR (8)
|
3.7
|
Planet Labs
|
USA (2014)
|
PAN
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
MS (3)
|
5
|
|
|
GeoEye-1
|
USA (2008)
|
PAN
|
0.46
|
3
|
|
|
MS (4)
|
1.84
|
|
Sentinel 2A & 2B
|
EU (2015)
|
MS-VNIR (4)
|
10
|
5
|
-
|
MS-VNIR (6)
|
20
|
5
|
MS-SWIR (3)
|
60
|
5
|
Terra - ASTER
|
US (1999)
|
MS (14)
|
15/30
|
4-16
|
|
|
|
MS-IR (2)
|
90
|
4-16
|
Terra - MODIS
|
US (1999)
|
MS-HIS (36)
|
250, 500 & 1000
|
Twice daily
|
-
|
Landsat-9*
|
US (2023)
|
OLI (8)
|
30
|
16
|
-
|
TIRS (2)
|
100
|
PAN
|
15
|
HyspIRI*
|
US (2020)
|
8 (IR)
|
60
|
5
|
|
*Remote sensing satellites to be launched.
India launched state of art multispectral high resolution remote sensing satellite, Resourcesat-2A in 2016 and Cartosat-2E with very high resolution panchromatic sensor in 2019. The multispectral sensors offers spatial resolution ranges from 5.8 to 56m whereas panchromatic sensor provides data of <1m resolution. WorldView-3 satellite gives 31cm PAN, 1.24m MS and 3.7m SWIR resolution data every day. SPOT-7 provided 1.5m PAN and 6m multispectral data on daily revisit. Sentinel 2A and 2B provide 10 multispectral bands with spatial resolution of 10-20m and 5 days revisit for land applications. Availability of different spatial resolution RS data are facilitating inventory of land resources from large scale to small scale to cater need of various users (Table 2). High spatial resolution RS data is used for mapping at detailed scale for preparing land resource plan at field level whereas coarse resolution data is useful for land resource inventories as exploratory survey at state and country level. Landsat series, ASTER, Sentinel-2 and 2A, MODIS and AVHRR satellites provide 20 to 1000m spatial resolution data in multispectral bands as “open source” which is freely available for wide land applications to various users. ESA also provide open access high temporal multispectral RS data of Sentinel-1 and 2 which are more popular to users (Drusch et al., 2012). Gaofen-1 and 2 (GF-1 and 2) are Chinese satellites provide PAN data at 2m and MS at 8-16m resolutions. Ziyuan-3 (ZY-3) with 2.1m resolution PAN and 5.8m resolution MS sensors is being used for land resource survey in China (Lin et al., 2013). MS RS is useful to discriminate the different natural and man-made features on the surface of the Earth (Smith, 2001; Ustin, 2004; Govender et al., 2006). US Digital Globe satellite systems are the world-leading providers of high resolution multispectral satellite data of 30cm spatial resolution from WorldView-3. Member agencies of the Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS) are planning more than 300 different remote sensing satellites for monitoring and observations of land, atmosphere and ocean in the coming years (CEOS, 2018).
Table 2. Land resource mapping scale and remote sensing data
Mapping scale
|
Thematic mapping scale
|
Standard scale
|
Spatial resolution of remote sensing data (meter)
|
Remote sensing data
|
User’s applications
|
Intensive
(Very detailed)
|
1:10,000 to 1:5,000 or more
|
1:5000
|
Very fine resolution (< 5)
|
Cartosat-1 and 2; IKONOS; Worldview
|
Village level, farm level
|
Detailed
|
1:10,000 to 1:25,000
|
1:25000
|
Fine resolution (5-10)
|
Resourcesat LISS IV 1&2; Quickbird; Worldview
|
Sub-district, block level
|
Semi-detailed
|
1:25,000 to 1:100,000
|
1:50000
|
Medium resolution (10-50)
|
Resourcesat - LISS II and III; LANDSAT; Aster; Spot
|
District level
|
Reconnaissance
|
1:100,000 to 1:500,000
|
1:250,000
|
Coarse resolution 50-100
|
Resourcesat- AWiFS;
|
State level
|
Exploratory
|
1:1000,000
|
-
|
Very coarse (>100)
|
MODIS; AVHRR
|
Country level
|
*Remote sensing satellites to be launched.
2.1 Microwave Remote Sensing
Microwave Remote Sensing satellites provide better observation capabilities as they are not influenced by the weather condition. Microwaves (MWs) can penetrate through clouds and operate day-night in all-weather condition to provide valuable information of land surface. Space-borne microwave remote sensing includes active and passive sensors to record land observation to provide vital information on soil moisture, vegetation cover, crop inventory, crop yield, biomass, flood inundation, water logged surface geomorphology, topography and geology, etc. Microwaves can penetrate into upper layer of soils and measure the below surface soil contents (Bhagat, 2014).
SMMR on Nimbus-7, SSM/I on DMSP, TRMM-TMI), AMSR-E on Aqua, SMOS mission by ESA, NASA-HYDROS mission and SMAP mission are major passive microwave radiometers (Wang and Qu, 2009). European SM and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission is first satellite (2009) with L-band (1.4 GHz) dual-polarized multi angular observations gives data for every three days at global scale with 50m resolution (Zhao et al., 2014). The low frequency microwaves penetrate more into the canopy therefore low frequencies (<15 GHz) are more suitable for SM retrievals (Zhao et al., 2014) and high frequencies (37 GHz) for vegetation studies (Wigneron, et al., 2003; Wen et al., 2006).
Active microwave sensor like SAR transmits MWs around 1 GHz-10 GHz to illuminate the land surface and measures the backscattered radiation from the object on the land surface to generate images at high spatial resolutions (10-100m). Active microwave remote sensing includes data in wavelength region of X-band (2.4-3.75cm), C-band (3.75-7.5cm), S-band (7.5-15cm), L-band (15-30cm), and P-band (30-100cm) and provides data in high spatial resolution (Solberg, 2012). X-band is useful for military purposes, terrain mapping and surveillance. Penetration capability of C-band is limited and restricted to the top layers whereas L-band penetrates into soil, vegetation (Jin et al., 2018). P-band (30-100 cm) not used much and being used for research and experimental applications. Passive microwave sensors such as radiometer measures emitted microwave energy from 19 to 200GHz. Emissivity are directly related to brightness temperatures (Tb) and used to estimate soil moisture but at coarse spatial resolution (Bhagat, 2014).
SAR satelites acquires images in dual mode: 1) like-polarization and 2) cross-polarization (HH and HV; or VV and VH). The quad polarization mode gives four linear polarizations: HH, VV, HV, and VH as amplitude and phase (Onojeghuo et al., 2018). In contrast to optical satellite images, synthetic aperture radars (SARs) can penetrate into the crop / vegetation canopies and soil surface and be used to generate sub-canopy and sub-surface information. Several researchers have showed the application of SAR data for analysis of crop canopy and soil properties at regional level (Kim et al., 2012; Wiseman et al., 2014). Today, several microwave remote sensing satellites namely IRS-RISAT, ENVISAT, Sentinel-1A and 1B, ALOS, ALOS-2, RADARSAT-2, TERRASAR-X, etc. are providing precise and valuable information for major land applications such as soil moisture estimation, kharif crop inventory and monitoring, multi-crop discrimination and mapping, crop bio-physical characterization, forest vegetation biomass estimation, snow cover area and glacial characterization, sea and coastal land characterization and monitoring (Bhagat, 2017; Singh et al., 2011; Srivastava et al., 2008). Passive space-borne sensors like AMSR-E, ASCAT, SMOS, SMAP and ESA-CCI are currently being used largely for providing global soil moisture products at very coarse spatial resolution to user community for various land applications (Ray et al., 2017; Peng and Loew, 2017). Global Precipitation Measurement Mission (GPM, launched in 2014) is follow-on of TRMM satellite in another satellite with passive radiometer sensor. Currently available major SAR satellites are described in Table 3.
Table 3. Microwave remote sensing satellites
Satellite
|
Country (Year)
|
Sensors
|
Spatial resolution (m)
|
Revisit time (days)
|
RISAT-1
|
India (2012)
|
C-band SAR
|
1-50
|
|
RISAT-1A/1B*
|
India (2019-20)
|
C-band SAR
|
1-50
|
|
ALOS-2
|
Japan (2014)
|
L-Band SAR
|
3
|
24
|
EnviSat
|
(EU (2002)
|
C-band SAR
|
28/50/950
|
35
|
Sentinel-1A&1B
|
EU (2014/2016)
|
C-band SAR
|
5/25
|
12
|
RADARSAT-2
|
Canada (2007)
|
C-band SAR
|
3/100
|
24
|
RADARSAT-3*
|
Canada (2019)
|
C-band SAR
|
3/100
|
24
|
Terra-SAR-2
|
Germany (2007)
|
X-band SAR
|
1/16
|
11
|
TenDEM-X
|
Germany (2010)
|
X-band SAR
|
1/3
|
11
|
HJ-1C
|
China (2006)
|
C-band SAR
|
5/20
|
4
|
KOMPSAT-5
|
South Korea (2013)
|
C-band SAR
|
1/20
|
28
|
NISAR*
|
India (2021)
|
L-Band SAR
S-Band SAR
|
3-10
|
12
|
LIDAR
|
|
ICEsat-2 (Lidar)
|
US (2003)
|
2 HSI
|
70
|
-
|
ICEsat-1 (Lidar)
|
US (2018)
|
1 HIS
|
10
|
-
|
*Remote sensing satellites to be launched.
2.2 Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
‘Hyperspectral Remote sensing satellites acquire very narrow, contiguous spectral bands throughout the visible, near-infrared, mid-infrared, and thermal infrared portions of the electromagnetic spectrum’ (ELwesemy, et al., 2016; Filchev, 2014). The hyperspectral sensing is based on beam splitting and the bands as a line sensor (Toth and Jóźków, 2016). Hyperspectral sensors collect spatial data using more than 50 narrow spectral bands based on continuous reflectance from each pixel in the image facilitate in-depth study of land surface elements. Intensive image pre-processing including corrections for atmospheric, radiometric and spatial distortions, data normalizations and quantitative analysis require for effective use of this data for quantitative estimates of biophysical and chemical properties of land surface features (Goodenough et al., 2006). Hyperspectral images have found many applications in vegetation, agriculture, soil, geology, water resource and environmental monitoring (Smith, 2001). It provides ample opportunity to study biophysical and biochemical parameters of crop and vegetation (Clark and Roberts, 2012). Several studies have used hyperspectral vegetation indices for analysis of characteristics of vegetation and crops (Pan et al., 2015), soil type and their mineralogical and chemical compositions (Ninomiya et al., 2005; Mahoney et al., 2002; Gosh et al., 2012). The Hyperion data is useful for assessments of salt-affected soils for sustainable land management at regional level (Kumar et al., 2014). Hyperion-1 remote sensing satellites provided large number of hyperspectral data and have been worldwide used for various land applications. Realizing its great potential in quantification of land surface features, several new hyperspectral RS satellites are planned by various agencies in coming years. A brief detail of existing and planned space-borne hyperspectral satellite is given in the Table 4. Relatively voluminous data, higher costs for data storage and pre-processing, requires skilled human resource, etc. are major constrains for applications of this technology (Filchev, 2014). Coarse spatial resolution (30m) is major drawback of majority hyperstectral sensors (Hyperion, PRISMA, HISUI, EnMAP and HyspIRI) overcome by high resolution (10 and 8m) sensors like SHALOM and HypXIM for detection and analysis of complex biophysical environmental aspects (Transon et al., 2018). High resolution panchromatic sensors of SHALOM, PRISMA and HypXIM could be helpful to improve the applicability of hyperspectral data (Transon et al., 2018). SHALOM provides high quality data on direct demand of end user (Feingersh, 2015).
Table 4. Hyperspectral remote sensing satellites
Satellite
|
Country (Year)
|
Spectral bands
|
Spatial resolution (m)
|
Revisit time (days)
|
Data access
|
HySI on IMS-1
|
India (2018)
|
64
|
550
|
-
|
Constrained access
|
GISAT / GeoHR*
|
India (2020-21)
|
60 VNIR
150 SWIR
6 LWIR
|
320
192
1500
|
|
Hyperion (EO-1)
|
US (2000)
|
220
|
30
|
16-30
|
Open access
|
HJ-1A/B
|
China (2008)
|
128
|
100
|
4
|
Constrained access
|
HyspIRI*
|
US (2020)
|
214
|
60
|
5-16
|
|
EnMAP-1
|
Germany (2017)
|
244
|
30
|
4
|
-
|
EnMAP-1*
|
Germany (2020)
|
244
|
30
|
4
|
PRISMA*
|
Italy (2019)
|
249
|
30
|
7-14
|
For Italy only
|
ALOS-3*
|
Japan (2019)
|
57 (SWIR)
128 (SWIR)
|
30
|
35
|
|
HISUI*
|
Japan (2019)
|
185
|
30
|
2-60
|
|
PROBA-1/2/V
|
Belgium (2001,
2009 and 2013)
|
15 (VIS)
4 (NIR)
|
100-300
|
1-2
|
|
HypXIM
|
France (2011)
|
210
|
8
|
3-5
|
|
TianGong-1
|
China
|
128
|
10 (VNIR)
20 (SWIR)
|
-
|
|
SHALOM
|
Italy-Israël (2017)
|
275
|
10
|
4
|
|
*Remote sensing satellites to be launched.
2.3 LiDAR
LiDAR [Light Detection and Ranging] is active remote imaging system and uses a very narrow band of electromagnetic spectrums. Satellite laser systems are primarily used to measure height of the target and land surface, ice sheet elevations, sea ice thickness, measurement of cloud and aerosol content of the atmosphere or high biomass vegetation assessment (Rosette et al., 2010). GLAS-LiDAR sensor was on the ICES Satellite (January, 2003) and its data is available for all, freely (Hajj et al., 2017). CALIPSO is another space-borne LiDAR of ESA’s Aeolus Mission with the Atmospheric Doppler LiDAR (ALADIN) aboard in April 2006.
2.4 Sensing from UAV platforms
Recent progress of mini unmanned airborne vehicles (UAVs) emerged as most promising high resolution remote sensing imagery for land applications. The technology is already miniaturized electronics for sophisticated personal use and these sensors are facilitating in the development of small UAVs. UAVs are typically used for data collection in the forms of video and images (Patterson and Brescia, 2010). The imaging payloads are approximately 300g for 1kg micro UAVs and about 5kg for 25-30 kg UAVs (Nebiker et al., 2008). The sensors are available in visible, multispectral, thermal infrared and microwave regions (Bhardwaj et al., 2015). These widely used remote sensing UAV sensors are inexpensive versions of lightweight optical cameras. UAV cameras with thermal range (8μm to 12μm) are useful to collect land surface data with ability of discrimination in temperature variations.
Several manufacturers have started fabricating and testing hyperspectral sensors for UAVs to collect the data in visible and NIR (0.3μm to 1.0μm) bands. They are small enough to install on small size UAVs. Brigham Young University (David Young at BYU), Utah, developed a lightweight micro-SAR sensor in collaboration with the University of Colorado (USA) to provide data at high spatiotemporal resolutions for real time applications (Jin et al., 2018). LiDAR sensors like 1) Ultra-lightweight Velodyne VLP-16 and 2) Powerful Riegl VUX-1 (Starek and Jung, 2015) and hyperspectral sensors like Rikola hyperspectral camera (Marcucci et al., 2014) have been introduced recently and more sensors systems are going to develop in coming years (Toth and Jóźków, 2016). UAVs are establishing as very promising tool for crop biophysical and nutrients mapping for crop management, crop disease and insect damage assessment and monitoring, mineral identification and mapping, disaster monitoring and forest fire monitoring due to its low operational cost, high temporal and spatial resolutions, user friendly operation, on-demand access to data, etc. (Matese et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2017). Reported constraints of technology are: 1) less capability and the strict airspace regulations for UAVs, and 2) lack of suitable methods and techniques for fast data processing and limited models for estimations and predictions of complex environmental parameters (Matese et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2017). This technique is more suitable for research application conducted for small region (Matese et al., 2015) and still unexplored for research applications in different bio-physical environmental conditions (Bhardwaj et al., 2015).
3 . FUTURE PLANNED REMOTE SENSING SATELLITES
In recent time, advances in microprocessors and electronics have resulted in a significant increase in remote sensing satellite capability in terms of high spatial, spectral and temporal resolutions. These satellites will be providing immense data as input for various operational and research projects in the field of cartography, defense, geology, agriculture, natural resources and more. India’s space agency ISRO has planned its third generation remote sensing satellite of Resourcesat-3 and 3A and Cartosat-3 series with high spatial and temporal resolution for wider land applications in coming years (planned to be launched 2019 or later). It will have a panchromatic resolution of 0.25 meters and multispectral of 1m. Resourcesat-3 and 3A are planned with 10m resolution with large coverage. India is developing Hyperspectral Imaging Satellite (HySIS) to acquire data in 55 spectral bands from 630km above ground by 2020. India in collaboration with NASA-JPL (USA) developing microwave remote sensing satellite namely NISAR that is scheduled to be launch by 2020. It will provide data in L- and S-bands with high spatial resolution data that will bring new era investigating hydrological applications, kharif crop inventory and crop yield modeling, multi-crop inventory, monitoring soil moisture and estimating high biomass vegetation cover types, etc. in the coming years. Landsat-9 (rebuild of Landsat 8) of Landsat series is a planned to launch in December, 2020 by NASA, Earth observation satellite. Landsat-10 with improved spectral bands is planned in 2027-28. Microwave remote sensing satellites 1C and 1D planned to be launched by 2021 by ESA which will insure the continuity of ERS and Envisat C-band data. Similarly, ESA is planning to launch its multispectral remote sensing satellites Sentinel-2C and 2D by 2021 to provide continuity of Sentinel series data. Canadian Earth Observation Company, UrtheCast’s has proposed constellation of sixteen OptiSAR Satellites (8 tandem pairs with 2 orbital planes) and eight optical satellites by end of 2020. It will provide multispectral data (4 band) at 5m in addition to having a 1m resolution X-band and 5m resolution in L-band SAR.
High-definition video from space
Now the novel capability of earth observation is being offered as full-motion video. It is one of the most exciting opportunities being offered from RS satellites to observe land processes and utilize temporal insight in observing earth surface processes. Google’s TerraBella provides high spatial (approximately 1m) and temporal (30 fps - frames per second) full-motion video imagery (Murthy et al., 2014; McCabe et al., 2017). UrtheCast will also providing HD video with spatial (1m). IRIS satellite is planned to provide 1m full-color video from space of ~60 seconds long. These data will be quite useful in understanding land surface processes of ecosystem functioning as well as monitoring of disaster and response in great details. These are providing video limited (60 and 90s captures) (McCabe et al., 2017) but the technology can be expanded for full-coverage with real-time observation in low Earth orbit satellite configurations (Han et al., 2015). They are also looking for a geostationary space surveillance system in future (Villien et al., 2014; McCabe et al., 2017). There are several satellites (Optical, hyperspectral and microwave) have been planned in coming years by various space agency. A brief list of these satellites with salient characteristics is given in Table 3 and 4.