4 (2020), 1, 1-13

Hydrospatial Analysis

2582-2969

Statistical Explanatory Assessment of Groundwater Quality in Gwale LGA, Kano State, Northwest Nigeria

Ahmad Abubakar Suleiman 1 , Auwalu Ibrahim 1 , Usman Aliyu Abdullahi 1

1.Department of Statistics, Faculty of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, Kano University of Science and Technology, Wudil 713281, Nigeria.

Mr.Ahmad Abubakar Suleiman*

*.Department of Statistics, Faculty of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, Kano University of Science and Technology, Wudil 713281, Nigeria

Dr.Pramodkumar Hire 1

1.Department of Geography, HPT Arts and RYK Science College, Nashik - 422 005.

04-10-2020
09-07-2020
01-09-2020
26-09-2020

Graphical Abstract

Highlights

  1. The groundwater quality of Gwale Area was compared with the permissible limits specified by the NIS.
  2. EC, TDS, Ca, TH, Mg, SO4 and Cl were influenced by anthropogenic and industrial activities.
  3. Correlation analysis was applied to identify the influence of each water parameter.
  4. Cluster analysis was used to classify the groundwater samples based on sources of contamination.
  5. The groundwater samples of cluster-III were highly contaminated and found unsuitable for drinking.

Abstract

Groundwater is one of the significant sources of drinking water in the world. To protect groundwater quality for domestic consumption, it is important to undertake a periodic investigation of its quality to improve the healthy living of the ever-increasing population. In this paper, we have analyzed physical and chemical (physicochemical) concentration levels in groundwater samples collected from twenty-eight sampling locations during the raining season in Gwale, Northwest Nigeria. About fifteen physicochemical parameters such as electric conductivity (EC), turbidity (Turb), pH,  temperature (Temp), nitrate (NO3), phosphate (PO4), total dissolved solid (TDS), chloride (Cl), sulphate (SO4), calcium (Ca), magnesium (mg), sodium (Na), total hardness (TH), iron (Fe) and alkalinity (Alk) were analyzed. The concentrations levels of groundwater parameters in each sampling location were compared with the permissible limits of drinking water qualities specified by the Nigerian Industrial Standard (NIS) to determine the suitability of drinking water in the study area. Karl Pearson’s coefficient of correlation was applied to the groundwater dataset to identify the influence of each physicochemical parameter to the groundwater contamination. Also, hierarchical cluster analysis was used to classify the groundwater samples based on contamination density as well as to identify the sources of water contamination. The results from correlation analysis revealed that EC, TDS, Ca, TH, Mg, SO4, Na and Cl were influenced the water contamination in many of the study locations based on the conventional significance levels (1% and 5%). From the results of cluster analysis, three statistically significant groups (cluster 1, cluster 2 and cluster 3) were formed which were defined as lower contaminated areas, moderately contaminated areas and higher contaminated areas, respectively. The contamination levels identified in the three clusters were attributed to anthropogenic and industrial activities in the raining season. Therefore, groundwater from cluster 3 (Salanta, Hauren makaranta, Dandago, Mandawari and Magashi) are found unsuitable for drinking. This study is useful in monitoring groundwater quality and could be applied in any other location.

Keywords

Physicochemical Parameters , Groundwater , Correlation Analysis , Cluster Analysis , Chemical Concentrations

1 . INTRODUCTION

One of the main global means of providing fresh water for drinking and other important domestic purposes is a groundwater supplies. Access to potable water in all developing nations in the world is increasingly lacking (Taiwo et al., 2012; Wagh et al., 2019). The level of purity observed in groundwater has steadily declined over decades due to so many human activities, such as rapid population growth, agricultural activity, urbanization, precipitation and industrial processes, which have raised groundwater to the risk of contamination (Tirkey et al., 2013; Wagh et al., 2018; Adewoyin et al., 2019; Kadam et al., 2019).  Today many urban regions in Nigeria have experienced water unsteadiness that resulted in the exploitation of groundwater resources for industrial and domestic purposes. Due to industrialization and urbanization, there has been an increase in human activities and the situation has resulted in further contamination of groundwater sources (Emenike et al., 2019).

Kano state has been described as Nigeria’s most populous city (WBG, 2016), which exhibits a high level of dependence on groundwater for domestic and industrial activities. Because of these factors, through industrial and residential activities with higher use for domestic water consumption linked to its fast-growing population, massive waste effluents are produced daily. The groundwater contamination occurred, however, due to the transport of hazardous and harmful materials produces from residential and industrial activities by leaching into the underground within the metropolis of Kano. The contamination in groundwater may spread waterborne diseases such as kidney failure, gastroenteritis, maternal and infant mortality, cholera, typhoid fever and giardiasis (Taiwo et al., 2015). Nigeria has experienced some of the worst cases of the recent cholera outbreak. In November 2001, three communities in Nigeria (Kano, Kwara and Akwa Ibom states) confirmed about 724 cases and 52 deaths from cholera outbreaks (WHO, 2001). Likewise, a total of 1905 cases and 73 deaths from the cholera epidemic were reported in Kano metropolis in October 2018 (NCDC, 2018). Hence, the assessment of groundwater quality in Kano state for its suitability for consumption is highly imperative.  

The desirable quality of groundwater is essential for the healthy living of all concerned consumers (Chika et al., 2020). It is important to monitor the quality of groundwater at a regular interval of time because its quality could be changed from time to time and place to place. The quality of groundwater is known, when details about its different physicochemical parameters are known. Therefore, it is necessary to measure and examine the levels of different groundwater parameters to make sure that they meet permissible levels of drinking water guidelines specified by appropriate authorities. The World Health Organization (WHO), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Nigerian Industrial Standard (NIS) have defined and established several groundwater quality criterions for drinking water. The NIS provides water parameters and maximum allowable limits in drinking water to ensure the protection of water consumers in Nigeria (NIS, 2015).    

Different statistical techniques are presently available for monitoring and assessing water quality parameters including multivariate statistical techniques (Reghunath et al., 2002; Mustapha, 2015; Bodrud-Doza, 2016; Zhang, 2020), frequency analysis (Ghashghaie  et al., 2018; Gorde and Jadhav, 2013), correlation and regression analyses (Gabriel and Donatus, 2010; Salim et al., 2014; Popoola et al., 2019), time-series analyses (Janina, 2012), methods based on non-parametric statistics (Liya and You, 2012), and exploratory data analysis techniques (Kumar et al., 2020). Recently, correlation analysis, cluster analysis and principal components analysis have been carried out (Gaikwad et al., 2020) to identify the important factors affecting groundwater chemistry. However, the earlier studies did not investigate physicochemical parameters that influence groundwater quality and its suitability in the study area. Consequently, the primary objectives of the present paper are (i) to compare groundwater physicochemical parameters in the study areas with the guidelines for drinking water defined by the NIS, with a view to drinking suitability (ii) to identify the influence of each physicochemical parameters to the groundwater contamination through correlation analysis, and (iii) to classify the samples of the study locations based on contamination density as well as identify the sources of water contamination using cluster analysis. The outcomes of the present study could be served as a reference to water regulators, consumers and researches for drinking water suitability in Gwale Local Government Area.

 

2 . MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY

2.1 Study Area

Kano state has been recognized as Nigeria’s most populous city and the largest administrative state in Nigeria’s northern part (WBG, 2016). Kano metropolis covers an area of 600 km2 situated in the Northwestern part of Nigeria, located between latitude 10º  and 12º N   and longitude 8º and 9º E (Amoo et al., 2018), the elevation is 488 m. Politically Gwale Local Government Area falls under 8 metropolitan local government areas, boarded with Dala to the North, Kumbotso to the South, Kano Municipal to the East and Ungogo to the West. The Northwestern region of the study area is encompassed by Goron Dutse hill and Yusuf Maitama Sule University. Gwale has many industries situated heavily at Sharada Phase-III.

There are two major geological structures in the Kano region, with minor intrusion as the third. The larger are of the south and north. West is indentation by rocks of basement complex with the intrusion of younger granite in the extreme southern parts. The unconsolidated sediments observed to the north-west area of the Chad republic. These two structures are separated by a transitional zone which constitutes the well define hydro-geological divide of the region. The rivers are located in the upland areas, which comprise river Kano and river Challawa. The climate of Kano is the tropical wet and dry type, with a dry season between 4 to 5 months (May to September) (Dan’azumi and Bichi, 2010). The area received rainfall of over 800 mm annually. The temperature varies by warm to hot seasons between November and February. Annual mean temperature ranges from about 21 degree Celsius to 27 degree Celsius (Bala et al., 2011).

Mustapha (2015) has reported that the land use of the study area includes residential use, industrial use, agricultural use and commercial use. The residential land use consists of different spatial buildings or houses and they are linear settlements. Apart from modern buildings, there are areas with traditional buildings. The industrial area of the region is located at Sharada Phase-III which is a mixture of many types of industries including heavy, light, wet, dry, food, household, textile, leather works, plastic and other varieties. The commercial land use of the study area comprises different commercial enterprises such as supermarkets, computer centers and medical stores. The sampling locations and geological setting are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively.

 

Figure 1. Study area with sampling locations

 

Figure 2. Geology

 

2.2 Water Sampling and Data Analysis

Twenty-eight samples of groundwater were collected from randomly selected open wells and boreholes in industrial and residential areas in Gwale Local Government area during the raining season in 2018 to determine the chemical composition of groundwater in the study area. After deciding on the location of sampling stations, their latitude and longitude were determined on a map using Geographical Position System (GPS). The collected samples were kept in cleaned plastic bottles and stored in an icebox by the standard method (American Public Health Association, 2005). Upon collection of the samples, a total of fifteen physicochemical parameters such as electric conductivity, turbidity, pH,  temperature, nitrate, phosphate, total dissolved solid, chloride, sulphate, calcium, magnesium, sodium, total hardness, iron  and alkalinity were measured from each groundwater sample. Parameters such as EC, pH, temperature, turbidity, and total dissolved solid were measured and recorded in their respective stations immediately after collection of samples and the remaining parameters were measured in the laboratory. Most of the parameters are expressed in milligram per liter (mg/L), except EC (µS/cm), pH, temperature (ºC) and TDS (NTU). All computations in this study are performed using SPSS 22.0 software.

2.3 Correlation Analysis

Correlation is a technique that measures the nature, degree and extent of association existing between two continuous variables. Karl Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r)  is a numerical measure of association 

between two variables, ξ and λ, which is expressed as given in equation (1).

\(r = {n(∑_{i=1}^nξ_i λ_i)-(∑_{i=1}^nξ_i)(∑_{i=1}^nλ_i) \over \sqrt{[n∑_{i=1}^nξ_i^2- (∑_{i=1}^nξ_i )^2 ].[n∑_{i=1}^nλ_i^2- (∑_{i=1}^nλ_i )^2 ]}}\)            (1)

where, n  represents the number of observations. The values of r  distribute between -1 and 1, a negative value represents a negative association, while a positive value indicates a positive association between the variables. A value of r=0  is an indication of negligible interaction between variables (Popoola et al., 2019). Saleem et al. (2012) designated the correlation values as ‘moderate’ and ‘strong’, concerning the r  values of 0.5-0.7 and > 0.7, respectively. The correlation value ( r<0.5) values imply a weak correlation. This technique was applied to correlate groundwater pollutants in investigated areas. The correlation of groundwater parameters is computed to identify the contribution amount of association of each parameter contributed to the groundwater contamination (Mejri et al., 2018).

2.4 Cluster Analysis    

Hierarchical cluster analysis is one of the statistical methods by which objects are classified based on their related characteristics and is represented by a dendrogram (McKenna, 2003). The dendrogram displays a graphic summary of the clustering processes, presenting a picture of the groups and their proximity, with a reasonable lessening in the dimensionality of the original data. The Euclidean distance shows the similarity between two samples and a distance can be represented by the difference between analytical values from the samples (Taoufik et al., 2017).

 

3 . RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

The results of all analyzed physicochemical parameters of sampled groundwater are provided (Table 1) with their respective study locations and the statistical description of the measured parameters compared to the minimum values set by the recommendations of the Nigerian Industrial Standard (NIS, 2015).

 

Table 1. Groundwater physicochemical parameters

Locations

Chemical parameters

In-situ physicochemical parameters

Ca

Mg

Na

Fe

Cl

SO4

PO4

NO3

TH

Alk

EC

pH

Temp

TDS

Turb

Chiranchi Yamma

60.9

9.23

24

0.02

140

13.3

0.38

0

190

12

796

6.66

30.5

453

0

Danbare B

22.4

3.4

8.61

0.06

45

4.98

0.5

8.6

70

6

279

6.86

29.7

160

0.75

Dandago

170

25.7

47.1

0.01

385

53

0.06

7.2

530

20

934

6.7

26.9

533

8.64

Diso

80.1

12.1

28.8

0.01

105

82

0

0

250

24

948

7.15

29.7

536

0

Dorayi Gidan Sarki

0

0

9.3

0.03

55

21.6

0.25

5.3

0

12

157

6.69

29.7

89.5

0.33

Dorayi Yankifi

44.9

6.8

21.6

0.05

80

23.2

0.25

0

140

10

550

6.35

29.7

315

0

Farin Gida

54.5

8.26

17.4

0.02

80

15.7

0.25

0

170

10

540

6.8

28.1

309

1.65

Gadon Kaya

28.8

4.37

23.8

0.02

160

15

0

1.1

90

10

615

6.04

32.4

347

0

Gidan Dagachi

99.3

15.1

40.7

0.1

150

9.96

0.05

0.6

310

26

1044

6.85

29.5

599

4

Goron Dutse

83.3

12.6

15.8

0.01

115

40

0.04

0

260

6

660

6.7

28.7

378

0.03

Hauren Legal

28.8

4.37

16.5

0.05

50

6.64

0.25

1.41

90

12

418

6.83

29.7

239

0.56

Hauren Makaranta

122

18.5

35.0

0.02

325

52

0

7.2

380

24

1998

6.94

29.7

1145

1.25

Janbulo

48.1

7.29

23.2

0.05

135

13.3

0.25

0.3

150

10

626

6.72

29.7

359

0

Kabuga

76.9

11.7

25.3

0.01

110

92

0.03

0

240

10

724

6.63

31.3

413

0

Kuntau

41.6

6.31

18.3

0.06

90

0.83

0.5

0

130

10

601

6.79

29.7

343

0

Kwanar Ganduje

22.4

3.4

17.2

0.01

85

14.1

0.37

0

70

12

444

6.55

30.7

254

2.27

Magashi

220

28.6

44.1

0.02

380

124

0.04

0

590

12

1058

7.08

25.2

599

4.36

Makera

80.1

12.1

27.5

0.04

215

14.9

0.12

0

250

14

1060

5.94

30.9

604

0

Mandawari

208

27.1

41.9

0.03

340

142

0.04

0

560

22

1054

6.99

29.5

607

0.64

Mundadu

28.8

4.37

19.6

0.01

90

19.9

0.37

3.5

90

8

511

6.69

29.7

291

0

Rinji

64.1

9.71

25.6

0.01

165

14.1

0.3

0

200

8

992

6.45

29.1

564

0

Salanta

179

27.9

34.9

0.02

290

15

0.38

1.4

560

30

1783

6.72

29.4

1020

0.48

Sani Mainagge

60.9

9.23

34.9

0.01

240

72

0

4

190

12

1191

6.73

32.7

681

0.93

Shago tara

73.7

11.2

15.6

0

150

26.5

0.25

0

230

8

855

6.3

29.9

488

0

Sharada Housing Est

41.6

6.31

13.5

0.02

55

11.6

0.5

0

130

10

320

6.86

28.4

182

17.1

Tudun Yola

54.5

8.26

22.9

0.02

95

58

0.17

0

170

14

653

6.56

29.3

377

1.1

Unguwar Lalle

22.4

3.4

16.1

0.02

80

16.6

0.25

0

70

6

416

6.7

29.4

238

0.71

Yamadawa

64.1

9.71

30.4

0.05

215

25.7

0.38

0.2

300

16

1242

6.64

29.7

709

0.66

Statistical summary

Mean

74.3

11.0

25.0

0.03

158

35.6

0.21

1.46

229

13.4

803

6.68

29.6

458

1.62

Standard Deviation

56.8

7.88

10.4

0.02

102

364

0.17

2.58

161

6.46

421

0.27

1.44

241

3.56

Minimum

0.00

0.00

8.61

0.00

45.0

0.83

0.00

0.00

0.0

6.00

157

5.94

25.2

89.5

0.00

Maximum

220

28.6

47.1

0.10

385

142

0.50

8.60

590

30.0

1998

7.15

32.7

1145

17.1

Skewness

1.39

1.17

0.55

1.52

1.06

1.67

0.20

1.78

1.1

1.19

1.12

-1.01

-0.68

1.14

3.56

Kurtosis

1.29

0.59

-0.46

2.70

0.03

2.19

-1.2

1.97

0.4

0.55

1.68

1.62

3.17

1.73

13.9

NIS 2015

75

20

200

0.3

250

100

3.5

50

150

250

1000

6.5 -8.5

Ambient

500

5

Note: Samples exceed the drinking standards of Nigerian Industrial Standard (NIS) are in bold.

 

 

 

 

3.1 Chemical Analysis

3.1.1Calcium

Calcium is the most essential yet abundant element in the human body and for normal growth and health, sufficient intake is necessary. The overall recommended daily intake is between 1 and 2 grams and is primarily 

extracted via dairy products. There is also some evidences that show in the region covered by a drinking water source with a high degree of hardness, the primary component of which is calcium, the occurrence of heart disease is decreased and as such the presence of the element in the water supply is advantageous to health.

High level of calcium can be beneficial and calcium rich water is very palatable (EPA, 2001). Severe calcium deficiency, however, is related to certain forms of children’s hypertension, prostate and colorectal cancer, certain forms of kidney stones, miscarriage, birth defects. It may result in menstrual and premenstrual complications, various bone-, joint- and periodontal disorders, muscle spasms and cramps, sleep disorders, psychological health / depressive disorders, cardiovascular and/or hemorrhagic illnesses, and many others, if a mother is deficient in calcium throughout pregnancy. Arthritic/joint and vascular degeneration, soft tissue calcification, hypertension and stroke, an increase in triglycerides, gastrointestinal disorders, mood and depressive disorders, chronic fatigue, increased alkalinity and general mineral imbalances are connected with excessive calcium levels. Besides, high calcium levels are often correlated with some forms of atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease, arrhythmias, heart diseases and stroke, high blood pressure, low stomach acid, depression, weakness, glaucoma, increased risk of multiple cancers, muscle joint pain, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, calcification, dry skin, constipation (Arabi et al., 2013). The calcium values for groundwater samples obtained for different sampling locations ranged from 0.00 to 220 mg/L (Table 1). The minimum and maximum of calcium concentrations were obtained in Dorayi Gidan Sarki and Magashi, respectively (Table 1). The concentrations of calcium above the NIS specified value of 75 mg/L were observed at the following locations; Magashi (220mg/L), Mandawari (208mg/L), Salanta (179mg/L), Dandago (170mg/L), Hauren Makaranta (122mg/L), Gidan Dagachi (99.3mg/L), Goron Dutse (83.3mg/L), Makera (80.1mg/L), Diso (80mg/L) and Kabuga (76.6mg/L).

3.1.2 Magnesium

Like calcium, magnesium remains abundant and a significant dietary requirement for humans (0.3-0.5 g / day). It is also the second major element of hardness and typically accounts for 15-20 % of the overall hardness (EPA, 2001).

Some kinds of irregular heartbeat, cardiovascular disease, anxiety, insomnia, nervousness, weakness, muscle/joint pain, osteoporosis, epilepsy, high stomach acid, asthma, high blood pressure, PMS, anxiety, sweating, muscle spasms/cramps, dysmenorrhea, angina, constipation, migraine/headaches are associated with low magnesium intake.

High magnesium intake, however, can lead to cardiovascular disease, arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, coma, muscle spasms, joint/spinal degeneration, bone loss, low stomach acid, low body temperature, low blood pressure, increased risk of multiple cancers, bowel / genitourinary bleeding, dry skin, fatigue, depression, vomiting, diarrhea (Arabi et al., 2013). Magnesium concentrations range from 0.00 to 28.60 mg/L from the samples analyzed at different locations, while the minimum and maximum values of magnesium were obtained at Dorayi Gidan Sarki and Magashi, respectively (Table 1). From the investigated study locations, four of the samples; Magashi (28.6mg/L), Salanta (27.9mg/L), Mandawari (27.1mg/L), and Dandago (25.7mg/L) magnesium concentrations above the permissible NIS standard value of 20mg/L  with the highest value of magnesium exhibited by groundwater sample collected from Magashi.

3.1.3 Sodium

Sodium in natural waters is still present. It is also a necessary dietary requirement and the usual consumption in food is the same as common salt (sodium chloride); 5 grams or more can be ingested daily. The key explanation for restricting it is the joint effect that can induce hypertension by exercising with sulphate, but too extreme an intake (the latter usually being 2-3 times the dietary threshold). If intake excess, the sodium induces hypertension inculcates in human brain (EPA, 2001). From the basis of the findings described in Table 1, the minimum and maximum sodium concentrations, 8.61 and 47.10 mg/L were exhibited for Dandago and Danbare B, respectively. All values obtained were, however, below the permissible 200 mg / L concentration defined by the NIS.

3.1.4 Iron

In soils and rocks, iron is present in large quantities, mainly in insoluble forms. Many complex reactions that occur naturally in soil formations, however, will give rise to more soluble iron forms that will therefore be present in water passing through such formations. Therefore, large quantities of iron can be found in the groundwater. Serious issues can be caused by the presence of iron in drinking water sources, but there is typically no adverse impact on people who ingest water with large quantities of iron. Instead, the concerns are largely aesthetic. When washed in water with excessive iron, laundry becomes stained and vegetables are also discolored when cooked. Problems with taste can also occur.

The iron objections are mainly organoleptic, but recent medical concerns have been raised about high levels of drinking water. Besides, anaemia has been discovered as a result of an iron deficiency in humans (Popoola et al., 2019). Haemosiderosis (liver-damage disease), diabetes mellitus, arteriosclerosis and many other neurodegenerative disorders are the products of substantial drinking water intake containing elevated levels of iron. (Nagendrappa et al., 2010; Brewer, 2009). The minimum and maximum iron values, 0.00 and 0.100 mg/L were observed at Gidan Dagachi and Shago Tara, respectively (Table 1).  From the samples tested, the iron concentrations of all samples were below the allowable NIS standard value of 0.30 mg / L.

3.1.5 Chloride

Water will begin to taste salty at levels above 250 mg/L and will become increasingly undesirable as the concentration further increases. External conditions, however, regulate acceptability and water containing up to 2,000 mg/L is consumed in some arid areas, but not by people who are unfamiliar with such concentrations. Similarly, high levels of chloride can make freshwater unsuitable for agricultural irrigation. Chloride does not pose a health risk to humans and palatability is the main factor. Excessive chloride concentrations in water, however, could lead to (1) laxative effects, (2) damage to metal pipes and (3) inadequacy of water for agricultural irrigation (Raviprakash and Krishna, 1989). As shown in Table 1, the concentration of chloride in the study area ranges from 45.00 to 385 mg/L  with Dandago and Danbare B having the lowest and highest concentrations, respectively. From the examined samples, five of the samples (Dandago, Hauren Makaranta, Magashi, Mandawari and Salanta) have Chloride concentrations above the permissible NIS standard value of 250 mg/L with the maximum concentration level revealed by groundwater sample collected from Dandago. The observed chloride concentrations above the permissible level could be linked to (1) dissolution of chloride-containing soils and rocks into groundwater bodies via leaching (Aremu et al., 2011) and (2) high chloride-rich sewage and municipal effluents discharged by residents in investigated locations for all the five sampling locations which later found its way into underground water (Gorde and Jadhav, 2013).

3.1.6 Sulphate

In almost all natural waters, sulfates occur, with concentrations varying according to the nature of the terrain from which they flow. They are also extracted from heavy metal (iron, nickel, copper and lead) sulphides. In sedimentary rocks from which they can be oxidized to sulphate in tropical weather, iron sulphides are present; the latter can then leach into water courses such that sulphate groundwater is always extremely high.

Large amounts sulphate, particularly in combination with magnesium and/or sodium, seems to have a laxative effect. Sulphate accumulation in water, however, can lead to an increase in water pH that causes acidosis (Asamoah and Amorin, 2011). The maximum and minimum concentrations of sulphate in the sample areas were 0.830 mg/L (Kuntau) and 142 mg/L (Mandawari) (Table 1). Sulphate concentrations of two locations, Mandawari (142 mg/L) and Magashi (124 mg/L) were above the standard limit of 100 mg/L provided by the NIS (Table 1).

3.1.7 Phosphate

The importance of phosphorus is primarily related to the eutrophication (over-enrichment) phenomenon of lakes and, to a lesser degree, rivers. Along with nitrogen as nitrate, phosphorus having access to such water bodies promotes the growth of algae and other plants that lead to blooms, littoral slimes, large-scale diurnal dissolved oxygen variations and related issues. Phosphate does not pose a health hazard to humans (EPA, 2001). Four locations (Diso, Gadon Kaya, Hauren Makaranta, Sani Mainagge) and three locations (Danbare B, Kuntau and Sharada Housing Est.) exhibited minimum and maximum of phosphate concentrations of 0.00 mg/L and 0.50 mg/L, respectively (Table 1). Phosphate concentrations of all examined samples were below the allowable level of 3.50 mg/L defined by the NIS (Table 1).

3.1.8 Nitrate

There is very little mineral origin of the nitrate present in natural waters, much of which comes from organic and inorganic sources, the former including discharges of waste and the latter including primarily artificial fertilizers. Bacterial oxidation and nitrogen fixation by plants, however, may also produce nitrates. Risk to infants over 11, however, when discharged into the atmosphere, highly concentrated waste containing nitrogen compounds may have been oxidized to nitrate and made its way by percolation into groundwater (Bruning-Fann and Kanaeme, 1993). The results obtained indicated a nitrate content of 0.00 mg/L and 8.60 mg/L with minimum and maximum concentrations (Table 1). All calculated values were below the 50.0 mg / L NIS permitted value.

3.1.9 Total Hardness

Hardness was commonly measured by titration with a soap solution, initially known to be the water’s capacity to kill the lather of soap. Nowadays, the study includes calcium and magnesium determination, which are the key components of hardness. While hardness can also lead to barium, strontium and iron, their concentrations are usually so low in this context that they can be overlooked. Thus, overall hardness is taken to include the concentrations of calcium and magnesium. In rock formations, the widespread abundance of these metals also contributes to very significant levels of hardness in surface and groundwater.

Hardness is a natural feature of water that can increase its palatability for drinking purposes and consumer acceptability. In recent years, health reports in many countries show that mortality rates from heart disease in areas with hard water are lower (EPA, 2001). The overall hardness concentration ranged from 0.00 mg/L (Dorayi Gidan Sarki) to 590 mg/L (Magashi) in the examined samples (Table 1). More than half (60.7%) of the samples tested were administered by the NIS above the acceptable limit of 150 mg/L.

3.1.10 Alkalinity

Alkalinity in natural water can be ascribed to carbonates and hydroxides. Usually analysis is carried out to differentiate between the alkalinity elements and this is done by using different indicators in the titration process and by making suitable calculations. The indicators most widely used are phenolphthalein (color change around pH 8.3) and methyl orange (color change around pH 4.5), leading to additional terms phenolphthalein alkalinity and methyl orange alkalinity. Alkalinity-related sanitary significance is unknown (even up to 400 mg / L), while unpalatability can lead to highly alkaline water (EPA, 2001). From the results presented in Table 1, the minimum and maximum total alkalinity concentration of 6.00 mg/L and 30.00 mg/L were observed in (Danbare B, Goron Dutse and Unguwar lalle) and (Salanta), respectively. However, all values obtained were below the allowable NIS specified concentration of 250 mg/L.

3.1.11 Electrical Conductivity

The electrical conductivity of water is often referred to as conductivity and is an indication of its capacity to conduct electricity. Since this ability is related to the sample’s ionic content, which in turn is a measure of the concentration of dissolved (Ionizable) solids, the importance of easily performed measures of conductivity is apparent. In itself, conductivity is a property of little interest to a water analyst but it is an invaluable measure of the range from which the value of hardness and alkalinity are likely to fall, as well as the order of the water’s dissolved solids material (EPA, 2001). The results from the collected samples showed that EC values ranged from 157.0 µS/cm (Dorayi Gidan Sarki) to 1998.0 µS/cm (Hauren Makaranta) (Table 1). The examined samples (28.6%) were above the permissible value of 1000 µS/cm set by the NIS (Table 1). The unacceptable EC value exhibited by these samples may be due to (1) dissolution of ionic heavy metals from manufacturing activities of heavy machines that later made their ways into groundwater via leaching of sub-soil layers (Eruola and Adedokun, 2012) and (2) higher temperature of the location enhancing movement of ions under electrostatic potential (Oguntona et al., 2012). The side effects are primarily water corrosion and the presence of heavy metals that render water unsafe for drinking (Popoola et al., 2019).

3.1.12 pH

The pH is, by definition, the negative logarithm of the solution's hydrogen ion concentration and is thus an indicator of whether the liquid is acidic or alkaline. The scale of pH (derived from the water ionization constant) varies between 0 (very acidic) and 14 (very alkaline). The most commonly encountered range, however, is 6.5-8.0. Extremes of pH can influence the water palatability, but a more urgent issue is the corrosive effect on delivery systems (EPA, 2001). As shown in Table 1, the pH values in the study areas varied from 5.94 to 7.15 with a mean value of 6.68±0.27, indicating acidic to slight alkaline in nature (Bodrud-Doza et. al., 2016). The measured values of groundwater samples at Makera (5.94), Gadon Kaya (6.04), Shago Tara (6.30), Dorayi Yankifi (6.35) and Ringi (6.45) were slightly acidic and values were not within the allowable range (6.5-8.5), provided by the NIS (Table 1). The slightly acidic nature of these locations can arise from the deposits of carbonic acid released by the reaction of carbon dioxide to rainwater (Tiwari et al., 2015). This may be exported through soil surface layer to form deposits in the groundwater through one of those chemical processes over some time. Nevertheless, acidic water has also been identified to cause damage to cells of mucous membrane, eyes and skin irritation (Meinhardt, 2006). Acidic water also contributes significantly to metal corrosion, combined with disinfection efficiency, which has an indirect effect on human health (Popoola et al., 2019).

3.1.13 Temperature

Fundamental biological and chemical processes that affect the cycling of oxygen, carbon and other elements in soil and groundwater are regulated by temperature. Nevertheless, recent research has shown that even minor temperature changes below 25ºC still can affect the quality of groundwater (Riedel, 2019). Of course, thermal pollution will also affect the position, possibly very substantially. The effect of temperature on living organisms, and particularly changes in temperature, can also be critical, and indeed the subject is very broad and complex.

It does not affect human health (EPA, 2001). However, a higher temperature may directly accelerate the degradation of organic pollutants in groundwater. Changes in temperature can also influence the redox chemistry of groundwater. In the study area, the temperature of the groundwater samples ranged from 25.20 to 32.70˚C (Table 1). Generally, at a higher temperature, the rate of chemical reactions increases. Water, especially groundwater, can dissolve more minerals from the rocks at higher temperatures. It will therefore have higher electrical conductivity (Kale, 2016).

3.14 Total Dissolved Solid

The parameter is determined as total solids, except that the sample is previously filtered by a given medium.   Using the very rapid determination of conductivity to provide an estimate of the total dissolved solids is also convenient and appropriate. The minimum and maximum values of TDS of the investigated groundwater samples were 89.50 mg/L (Dorayi Gidan Sarki) 1145 mg/L (Hauren Makaranta) (Table 1). Nearly (39.3%) of the water samples recorded maximum TDS values higher than the 500 mg/L threshold limit as given by the NIS. The maximum TDS values revealed by these locations are an indicator of salty water that can be due to (1) the presence of natural solute by soil dissolution and weathering; and (2) the discharge from industrial treatment plants causing leaching of soil contamination and pollution of groundwater by point-source. The ionic intensity also increases as the TDS concentration of water samples increases (Popoola et al., 2019).

3.1.15 Turbidity

The presence of very finely dispersed solids results in turbidity in water. The presence of turbidity in water can influence its consumer’s acceptability and may also have a direct effect on its usefulness in some industries. Turbidity-forming particles can also interfere with the physical and chemical characteristics of water, and the effects can be severe in the case of the disinfection process. Since turbidity can be caused by sewage matter in water, there is indeed a danger that the turbidity particles may support pathogenic organisms and thus escape the disinfectant’s action (EPA, 2001). Direct health effects are dependent on the precise composition of the materials that cause turbidity, but there are other consequences. The turbidity values in the study areas ranges from 0.00 NTU to 17.10 NTU with a mean value of 1.62±3.56NTU (Table 1). Only two sampling locations, Sharada Housing Est. (17.1 NTU) and Dandago (8.64 NTU) were above the NIS permissible value of 5.00 NTU, as presented (Table 1).

3.2 Correlation of Groundwater Pollutants

The results from correlation analysis reveal that majority of assessed groundwater parameters were significantly correlated with one another, positively or negatively at various levels of significance (1% and 5%) (Table 2). The concentration of Ca was significantly, strongly correlated with Mg (r=0.99) , TH (r=0.99) , Cl (r=0.88) , and Na (r=0.84) . The examined Mg exhibits a strong and positive correlation with TH (r=0.99) , Cl (r=0.88) , Na (r=0.84) , EC (r=0.72) , and TDS (r=0.72) . A significant strong correlation was obtained between Na and Cl (r=0.73) , Na and TH (r=0.86) , Na and EC (r=0.73) , and Na and TDS (r=0.73) . Also, the measured Cl was strongly associated with TH (r=0.90) , EC (r=0.77) , and TDS (r=0.77) . Other parameters that correlated strongly with one another include TH with EC (r=0.74)  and TH with TDS (r=0.73) ; Alk with EC (r=0.71)  and Alk with TDS (r=0.72) ; and EC with TDS (r=1) . The strong correlation between EC and TDS indicates EC is attributed to the dissolution of salts and inorganic pollution load in the water (Wagh et al., 2018). These parameters were strongly correlated with one another based on a 1% level of significance. The remaining parameters were moderately or weakly correlated (positively or negatively) with one another at a 1% or 5% level of significance. However, the strong correlation between the examined parameters: EC, TDS, Ca, TH, Mg, SO4 and Cl, is an indication that anthropogenic and industrial activities were responsible for contamination of the assessed groundwater parameters in the study area.

 

Table 2. Correlation matrix

 

Parameters

Ca

Mg

Na

Fe

Cl

SO4

PO4

NO3

TH

Alk

EC

pH

Temp

TDS

Turb

Ca

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mg

.99

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Na

.84

.84

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fe

-.12

-.12

.03

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cl

.88

.88

.88

-.17

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SO4

.68

.62

.59

-.33

.58

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PO4

-.44

-.43

-.58

.19

-.48

-.64

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NO3

.01

.03

.05

.02

.20

-.05

-.02

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TH

.99

.99

.86

-.10

.90

.62

-.41

.02

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alk

.61

.66

.69

.18

.56

.28

-.33

.12

.66

1

 

 

 

 

 

EC

.67

.72

.73

-.08

.77

.32

-.38

.10

.74

.71

1

 

 

 

 

pH

.34

.31

.23

.09

.13

.41

-.02

.20

.31

.33

.11

1

 

 

 

Temp

-.50

-.48

-.24

.01

-.30

-.22

-.06

-.02

-.48

-.08

-.01

-.47

1

 

 

TDS

.67

.72

.73

-.08

.77

.32

-.38

.10

.73

.72

1.0

.11

-.01

1

 

Turb

.16

.16

.12

-.04

.10

.01

.15

.08

.16

.08

-.12

.24

-.44

-.11

1

The significant correlation at 1% and 5% levels are bolded.

 

 

3.3 Cluster Analysis

The cluster analysis of 28 sampling stations provided three clusters of similarities based on groundwater contamination, as shown in (Figure 3). Cluster 1 corresponds to 11 sampling locations namely:  Shago tara, Ringi, Chiranchi Yamma, Yamadawa, Makera, Gadon kaya, Diso, Tudun yola , Goron dutse, Kabuga and Sani Mainagge. However, two samples, Shago tara and Ringi are situated at an industrial site and the remaining samples are located at the residential site of the study area. Hence, anthropogenic and industrial activities were identified as the main sources of groundwater contamination in cluster 1. Cluster 2 consists of 11 sampling sites: Mundadu, Kwanar Ganduje, Farin gida, Unguwar lalle, Hauren legal, Kuntau, Janbulo, Dorayi yankifi, Danbare B, Dorayi gidan sarki, and Sharada housing estate. Five groundwater samples collected from Mundadu, Kwanar Ganduje, Farin gida, Unguwar lalle, and Sharada housing estate are from the industrial area and the remaining samples are located in residential areas. Therefore, the water contaminations in this cluster were influenced by anthropogenic and industrial activities.  The groundwater of industrial locations of cluster 1 and cluster 2 is contaminated due to various categories of wet industries, including leather and tanning, metal, glass, cosmetic industries, among others.  Cluster 3 contains 6 groundwater samples such as Gidan dagachi, Salanta, Hauren makaranta, Dandago, Mandawari and Magashi, and contaminated by various anthropogenic processes. This cannot be a surprise that locations of cluster 3 are surrounded by various anthropogenic activities such as municipal waste and effluents being discharged by the residents, discharges of domestic waste dumpsites and improper soak away sites, among others. However, locations in cluster 3 showed the highest contamination levels compared with cluster 2 and cluster 1. Consequently, the locations in cluster 3 were classified as higher contaminated areas, while locations in cluster 2 and cluster 1 were classified as moderate and lower contaminated areas, respectively. Hence, the groundwater of sampling locations of cluster 3 is not suitable for drinking. The contamination levels of EC, TH, TDS, Cl, SO4, Ca and Mg in most sampling locations identified in these clusters are influenced by rainfall, anthropogenic and industrial sources (Wagh et al., 2019; Mukate et al., 2020).

 

Figure 3. Hierarchical cluster analysis

 

4 . CONCLUSIONS

The groundwater quality of Gwale Local Government Area was compared with the permissible limits of drinking water quality specified by the Nigerian Industrial Standard (NIS) to determine the suitability of drinking water in the study area. Fifteen physicochemical parameters which include Ca, Mg, Na, Fe, Cl, SO4, PO3, NO3, TH, Alk, EC, pH, Temp, TDS, and Turb were selected and examined for drinking suitability. Correlation analysis was applied to the groundwater dataset to identify the influence of each physicochemical parameter to the groundwater contamination.  Cluster analysis was used to classify the groundwater samples based on contamination density as well as identify the sources of contamination. We found that EC, TDS, Ca, TH, Mg, SO4, Na and Cl were influenced the water contamination in many of the study locations.

The groundwater samples collected from Salanta, Hauren makaranta, Dandago, Mandawari and Magashi were classified as higher contaminated areas due to anthropogenic activities and are found unsuitable for drinking.

5 . RECOMMENDATIONS

Periodic monitoring of groundwater parameters should be practiced since these parameters could change from time to time and place to place. Waste dumpsite has been recognized as the large source of anthropogenic source of pollution of groundwater in the study areas, therefore, stakeholders in waste management in the examined locations such as REMASAB and ministry of the environment should enlighten residents on the importance of locating municipal waste dumpsites away from residential areas.

The government of Kano state should investigate the practice of effluents discharged by hazardous industries activities. However, for areas exposed to excessive concentrations of hazardous groundwater parameters, the health status for residents should be determined by the medical experts. Further study should be carried out on the health impact of higher concentrations of groundwater quality parameters in the study area. Also, a study on heavy metals in the study areas may be carried out.

Conflict of Interest

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This project was financially supported by the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TET Fund) under the Institutional Based Research (IBR) grant, which was allocated to KUST, Wudil in 2018. Also, the authors appreciated the editorial team for their valuable contributions to the improvement of the quality of this paper.

Abbreviations

EPA: Environmental Protection Agency; KUST: Kano University of Science and Technology; LGA: Local Government Area; NCDC: Nigeria Centre for Disease Control; WHO: World Health Organization.

References

3.

Arabi, A.S., Funtua, I.I, Dewu, B.B.M., Garba, M.L., Okoh, S., Kwaya, M.Y. and Bolori, M.T., 2013. Assessment of calcium and magnesium concentrations in groundwater as supplements for sleep related ailments. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci., 3(7), 29-35.

4.

Aremu, M.O., Olaofe, O., Ikokoh, P.P. and Yakubu, M.M., 2011. Physicochemical characteristics of stream, well and borehole water sources in Eggon, Nasarawa State, Nigeria. J Chem Soc Niger, 36(1), 131-136.

11.

Dan’azumi, S. and Bichi, M.H., 2010. Industrial pollution and heavy metals profile of Challawa River in Kano, Nig. J. Appl. Sci. Envt. Sanitation, 5(1), 23-29.

13.

EPA [Environmental Protection Agency], 2001. Parameters of water quality-interpretation and standards. Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland.

18.

Gorde, S. P. and Jadhav, M. V., 2013. Assessment of water quality parameters: A review. J Eng Res Appl, 3(6), 2029-2035.

19.

Janina, M., 2012. Detecting and estimating trends of water quality parameters. Dr. Voudouris (Ed.), Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment,  InTech.

24.

Liya, F. and You-Gan, W., 2012. Statistical tools for analyzing water quality data. Dr. Voudouris (Ed.), Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment, InTech.

25.

McKenna, J. E., 2003. An Enhanced cluster analysis program with bootstrap significance testing for ecological community analysis. Environ Model Softw 18(3), 205-220.

28.

Mkadmi, Y., Benabbi, O., Fekhaoui, M., Benakkam, R., Bjijou, W., Elazzouzi, M., Kadourri, M. and Chetouani, A., 2018. Study of the impact of heavy metals and physico-chemical parameters on the quality of the wells and waters of the Holcim area (Oriental region of Morocco). J Mater Environ Sci, 9(2), 672-679.

33.

NIS [Nigerian Industrial Standard], 2015. Nigerian standard for drinking water quality. NIS-554.

36.

Raviprakash, S. L. and Krishna, R. G., 1989. The chemistry of groundwater Paravada area with regard to their suitability for domestic and irrigation purpose. India J Geochem, 4(1), 39-54.

43.

Tirkey, P., Tanushree, B. and Sukalyan, C., 2013. Water quality indices– Important tools for water quality assessment: a review. International Journal of Advances in Chemistry, 1(1).