Assessment of Flood Susceptibility Mapping in the Krishna River Basin using Geospatial Techniques - Gatha Cognition

loader
Gatha Cognition®
Perception, Learning and Reasoning

Article Title :

Assessment of Flood Susceptibility Mapping in the Krishna River Basin using Geospatial Techniques

Hydrospatial Analysis

10 (2026)

1

1-24

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

GIS , Krishna River Basin , Analytical Hierarchy Process , Flood susceptibility , Geospatial Techniques

Crossref citations: 1
OpenAlex citations: 1
Views: 447
Citations (Dimensions) :
Gatha Cognition Free Publication
Cross Referance

A flood is an excess of water that swamps normally dry land due to heavy rainfall, storm surges, or dam failures, often leading to significant damage and displacement. This study evaluates flood susceptibility in Krishna River Basin (KRB) (India) using geospatial techniques and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Thirteen physiographic parameters elevation, slope, proximity to rivers, geomorphology, drainage density, flow accumulation, rainfall, land use/land cover (LULC), geology, soil type, Stream Power Index (SPI), Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), and curvature were integrated into a multi-criteria decision framework and processed in ArcGIS 10.8. Pairwise comparison matrices assigned weights to parameters, validated by a consistency ratio (CR = 0.04), ensuring robust model reliability.

The results classify the KRB into five susceptibility zones: very low (21%), low (21%), moderate (20%), high (19%), and very high (19%). High-risk areas correlate with low-lying floodplains, clay-loam soils, dense drainage networks, and built-up-agricultural zones. The validation of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) using the Area Under the Curve (AUC) indicated robust performance, achieving 79% accuracy. Approximately 30 cities, including Pune, Vijayawada, and Solapur, face significant flood threats. The present study offers actionable intelligence for providing a spatial decision-support framework for prioritizing flood mitigation investments, enforcing land-use zoning in high-risk zones, and optimizing reservoir operations to manage downstream flood peaks. This research underscores the value of geospatial-AHP integration, offering actionable insights for urban planners and disaster management authorities to enhance community resilience. Future research should integrate real-time data and machine learning for dynamic predictions while considering local human impacts.

Graphical abstract for Assessment of Flood Susceptibility Mapping in the Krishna River Basin using Geospatial Techniques

The study integrates 13 physiographic parameters in ArcGIS using a multi-criteria AHP, validated by a high consistency ratio (CR = 0.04).

It classifies the Krishna River Basin into five susceptibility zones, revealing that 38% of the area falls into the high and very high-risk categories.

High flood risk is strongly correlated with low-lying floodplains, clay-loam soils, dense drainage networks, and built-up-agricultural land use.

The model demonstrates robust predictive capability, achieving 79% accuracy when validated using the Area Under the Curve (AUC) method.

The findings identify approximately 30 major cities at risk, offering actionable insights for prioritizing mitigation, land-use zoning, and flood management.

2.

Al-Ruzouq, R., Shanableh, A., Jena, R., Gibril, M. B. A., Hammouri, N. A. and Lamghari, F., 2024. Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel integration of multi-temporal sentinel-1 data and eXtreme deep learning model. Geoscience Frontiers, 15(3), 101780.

3.

Andualem, T. G. and Demeke, G. G., 2019. Groundwater potential assessment using GIS and remote sensing: A case study of Gunatana landscape, upper blue Nile Basin. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 24, 100610.

19.

Chen, W., Panahi, M. and Pourghasemi, H. R., 2017. Performance evaluation of GIS-based new ensemble data mining techniques of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with genetic algorithm (GA), differential evolution (DE) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) for landslide spatial modelling. Catena, 157, 310–324.

40.

Elkhrachy, I., 2015. Flash flood hazard mapping using satellite images and GIS tools: A case study of Najran City, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 18(2), 261-278.

45.

Gaikwad, V. P., 2019. Assessment of morphometric characteristics and demarcation of ground water potential zones using geo spatial technique for vel and sal watershed, India. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, Department of Geography, Savitribai Phule Pune University.

50.

Gokceoglu, C., Sonmez, H., Nefeslioglu, H. A., Duman, T. Y. and Can, T., 2005. The 17 March 2005 Kuzulu landslide (Sivas, Turkey) and landslide susceptibility map of its near vicinity. Engineering Geology, 81, 65–83.

59.

Islam, K., 2024. GIS based flood susceptibility mapping in the Keleghai river basin, India: A comparative assessment of bivariate statistical models. Discover Water, 4(1), 129.

60.

Jain, S. K., Agarwal, P. K. and Singh, V. P., 2007. Hydrology and Water Resources of India (57). Springer Science and Business Media.

76.

Krishna River Basin Report, Central Water Commission (CWC) and National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC), Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), 2014. Government of India Report (2.0), 1–180.

90.

Miguez, M. G. and de Magalhaes, L. P. C., 2010. Urban flood control, simulation and management–an integrated approach. In Methods and Techniques in Urban Engineering (131–160).

101.

Paswan, A., Agarwal, A., Kumar, V. and Varma, S., 2025. Multicriteria decision-making for sustainable groundwater in Deccan Plateau basalts. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 51, 101–110.

106.

Razavi-Termeh, S. V., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., Jelokhani-Niaraki, M. and Choi, S. M., 2025. Flood susceptibility mapping using optimized deep learning models: A non-structural framework. Applied Water Science, 15(8), 1–25.

107.

Risi, R. D., Jalayer, F., Paola, F. D. and Lindley, S., 2017. Delineation of flooding risk hotspot based on digital elevation model, calculated and historical flooding extents: The case of Ouagadougou. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 32, 1545–1559.

117.

Suykens, C., Priest, S. J., van Doorn-Hoekveld, W. J., Thuillier, T. and van Rijswick, M., 2016. Dealing with flood damages: Will prevention, mitigation and ex post compensation provide for a resilient triangle? Ecology and Society, 21(4), 1.

130.

Ward, R. C. and Robinson, M., 1975. Principles of Hydrology (367). McGraw-Hill.

Recommend this Article